|
|
NOTES | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| Hypotheses | ||||||||
|
1
|
Land use practices |
469
|
774
|
2,995
|
6,008
|
6,004
|
6,184
|
Some sharing with #2, #3, & #13 |
|
2
|
Water quantity |
5
|
200
|
600
|
800
|
100
|
100
|
Most FTE's supplied under #1 |
|
3
|
Habitat restoration |
32,505
|
41,291
|
41,340
|
42,128
|
37,440
|
37,440
|
See Soscia memo for breakout of costs |
|
4
|
Supplementation |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Costs included under #3 |
|
5
|
Reintroduction |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Costs included under #3 |
|
6
|
Juvenile salmon passage
a. Capital facilities b. Hydro. operations c. Existing O&M d. Existing F&W debt serv. |
17,892
270,000 40,000 73,000 |
38,922
270,000 40,000 80,000 |
61,094
270,000 40,000 88,000 |
97,653
270,000 40,000 95,000 |
137,643
270,000 40,000 102,000 |
149,959
270,000 40,000 106,000 |
From COE; 50 yr amortization @
8%
From BPA rate case for BiOp From BPA rate case From BPA rate case |
|
7
|
Estuary | |||||||
|
8
|
Production index |
83
|
65
|
40
|
47
|
44
|
45
|
|
|
9
|
Selective fisheries |
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Costs included under #10 |
|
10
|
Harvest ceilings |
365
|
370
|
382
|
398
|
405
|
416
|
Costs included under #6 |
|
11
|
Adult salmon passage | |||||||
|
12
|
Water quality |
250
|
250
|
250
|
250
|
250
|
250
|
|
|
13
|
Stock-specific concerns |
398
|
859
|
1,830
|
2,357
|
1,103
|
1,116
|
|
|
14
|
Lamprey passage |
278
|
349
|
390
|
408
|
298
|
315
|
Assumes Umatilla tribe's BPA project is funded |
|
15
|
White sturgeon |
1,765
|
1,863
|
1,967
|
2,078
|
1,985
|
2,107
|
|
| Hypotheses Total |
437,010
|
474,943
|
508,888
|
557,127
|
597,272
|
613,932
|
||
| Recommended Institutional Changes | ||||||||
|
1
|
Enforcement |
641
|
560
|
580
|
616
|
630
|
655
|
|
|
2
|
Watershed teams |
5,500
|
5,500
|
5,500
|
5,500
|
5,500
|
5,500
|
|
| GRAND TOTAL |
443,151
|
481,003
|
514,968
|
563,243
|
603,402
|
620,087
|
||